Grand Dunman By The Numbers, September 2026: 703 Units Sold At A Median Of S$2,517 psf

Grand Dunman has been selling for 39 months. If you are watching District 15, the month-by-month record shows how a large launch moves after its opening weekend.

In this article, we look at Grand Dunman's developer sales by month and by unit size. We also compare them with nearby resales and with other District 15 launches.

The project has recorded 703 developer sales since July 2023, at an overall median of S$2,517 psf. That is 69.7% of its 1,008 units. The figures come from URA Data Service caveats, which are recorded transactions rather than valuations.

The developer is SingHaiyi Group, according to the developer's website.

How Many Units Have Sold Each Month?

Grand Dunman is a 99-year leasehold project in District 15. The table and chart below set out caveats by month, the running total, and the median psf in each month.

The busiest month was July 2023, with 349 caveats. Sales have been thinner since. The three months to September 2026 brought 22 caveats in total, including two in September 2026 itself.

Note that the median psf has stayed in a narrow range. It was S$2,502 psf in the first month and S$2,447 psf in September 2026, a move of -2.2%. Monthly medians in single-digit months rest on very few caveats.

Which Unit Sizes Sold Most?

Caveats split into five size bands. The table below gives the count, median area, median price and median psf for each.

The 70 to 89 sqm band was the largest, with 200 caveats. Its median area was 797 sqft and its median price S$2,118,852, or S$2,498 psf.

The 120 sqm and above band follows with 198 caveats, at a median price of S$3,743,500. Smaller units carry the higher psf. Under 50 sqm sits at S$2,609 psf, against S$2,490 psf for the largest band.

How Do Nearby Resales Compare?

Within 1,000 m of Grand Dunman, 707 resales were recorded across 165 completed projects in the 24 months to September 2026. The median was S$1,910 psf. The launch median runs 31.8% above that.

The table below shows the busiest of those nearby projects by resale count.

Park Place Residences At Plq led on volume, with 45 resales at a median of S$2,285 psf. The Esta recorded the highest median among them, at S$2,428 psf. Dunman View, the closest at 175 m, had 13 resales at S$1,590 psf. Tenure and age differ across these projects, so the gaps are not like-for-like.

What Did Other District 15 Launches Do?

Grand Dunman is not the only project selling in the district. The table below covers developer sales at other District 15 launches over the 12 months to September 2026.

The Continuum sold the most, with 180 caveats at a median of S$2,795 psf. Arina East Residences follows with 67 caveats at S$2,821 psf.

Note that the highest medians sit with the smallest counts. Meyer Blue recorded 20 caveats at S$3,170 psf, and Amber House 28 caveats at S$3,104 psf. All but Tembusu Grand on this list are freehold.

Key Takeaways

Grand Dunman has sold 703 of 1,008 units since July 2023, or 69.7%, at an overall median of S$2,517 psf. July 2023 alone accounted for 349 caveats. The median psf has shifted -2.2% from the first month to September 2026. The most sold band was 70 to 89 sqm, with 200 caveats at a median of S$2,118,852.

These are medians of recorded caveats, not valuations of any home. They tell you what was lodged and at what price. They cannot tell you which stacks, floors or facings are left, and months with one or two caveats say little on their own.

Method: URA caveats for developer sales ('new sale') at the project, dated to the month. Size bands by the caveated floor area. The nearby comparison is resale caveats in completed projects within one kilometre over 24 months, unadjusted for size, age or floor. Units sold is the caveat count, which lags option exercises by weeks. Private figures are from URA Data Service caveats, HDB figures from data.gov.sg resale records, both loaded weekly by this site's ingest. Medians are of the non-excluded transactions in the period named. Sales flagged by the hygiene rules (related-party transfers, bulk deals, outliers) are left out. Every figure is indicative and drawn from recorded transactions, not a formal valuation. Facilities, layouts and photographs, where shown, are as supplied by the developer or seen on our own visit, and are not engine data.